SADFASFD Membership

Ontario Field Crop Report – July 6, 2022

Enhancing Corn & Soybean Yields in Ontario

How adding complexity to crop rotations and diversity to tillage practices can benefit corn and soybean growers long term.

By Laura Scott

Gone are the days of grandpa getting the tractor and 3 furrow plow out to work the whole farm each fall after harvest. For decades now, producers have been developing and adapting new technologies and practices to optimize land use, while continuing to care for it. Thirty-one years of data evaluated by the University of Guelph demonstrates the various effects of changing tillage practices and crop rotations in Ontario field crop production.

It seems as though our seasons are becoming more and more variable each year, with bigger temperature swings and dramatic changes in precipitation. With more time between rain events, crops need to be efficient in water conservation and usage.

A research report published in 2015 titled “Increasing Crop Diversity Mitigates Weather Variations and Improves Yield Stability”, demonstrates that more diverse crop rotations beyond corn and soybeans is a key factor in yield increases. Reducing and adjusting tillage is also shown to have a significant effect on yield. As part of Dr. Bill Deen’s research team at the University of Guelph, Amelie Gaudin and colleagues studied thirty-one years of weather data from the University of Guelph, Elora Research Station. Both crop rotations and tillage data were evaluated for corn yield advantages, corn and soybean yield stability and any other potential benefits.

Their findings showed moving from a 2 crop (corn-soybean rotation) to a 3-crop rotation (adding wheat to corn-soybean rotation) increased the following average soybean yields by 13%. The 5-year average for Ontario soybeans is 49 bu/ac. The more crops in a rotation, and the more times the complex rotation repeated, the better the long-term effects.

Corn and soybeans displayed different yield reactions to the various methods of mitigating stresses (Figure 1.). While corn appeared to favour crop rotation and diversity, adjusting tillage practices had little effect on yield and stress tolerance. However, soybeans preferred changes in tillage programs over rotation diversification. Less tillage on soybean ground resulted in more consistent crop stress mitigation than conventional tillage. Tillage and crop diversity had a greater positive effect on crop response to heat and drought than they did for wet and cold periods. These practices offered some yield stabilization for wet and cold periods (or entire seasons), but it was lesser than the effects noted during drought stresses.

Figure 1. Soybeans planted after corn in Carleton County, 2021

More recent research published in 2020, confirmed the earlier results. Sites across Canada and the United States saw an average yield increase of 28.1% across all conditions when crop rotations were more diverse (Long-Term Evidence Shows that Crop-Rotation Diversification Increases Agricultural Resilience to Adverse Growing Conditions in North America). They also saw a large reduction in yield losses on drought years. Sites used both synthetic nitrogen and organic nitrogen, and varied tillage systems between no till, reduced till and conventional tillage.

Adding small grain cereals, forage legumes and other niche crops can add some costs and can complicate management practices, but does it have a place on your operation? The more complex the rotation, and the more diverse the tillage practices, the higher the potential to reduce crop stresses. Add in the potential benefits for weed, pest and disease control, and the value may soon dramatically outweigh the cost for your farming operation.

Weather Data

Location & Year

Weekly June 27 – July 3 2022

Accumulated

Highest Temp (°C)

Lowest Temp (°C)

Rain (mm)

Rain (mm) April 1st

GDD 0C April 1st

GDD 5C April 1st

CHU May 1st

Harrow 2022

31.1

9.2

0.9

209

1388

950

1399

Harrow 2021

30.0

7.8

89.6

242

1397

946

1316

Harrow 10 YR Avg. (2011-20)

26.8

15.1

26.8

291

1369

901

1379

Ridgetown 2022

31.2

6.6

2.4

177

1293

864

1275

Ridgetown 2021

29.7

6.1

98.2

240

1314

871

1246

Ridgetown 10 YR Avg. (2011-20)

26.3

13.6

15.1

241

1279

817

1278

London 2022

29.8

6.6

8.6

190

1252

827

1225

London 2021

28.2

7.5

66.2

213

1309

870

1217

London 10 YR Avg. (2011-20)

26.1

13.8

28.6

267

1256

797

1256

Brantford 2022

31.4

7.4

4.2

180

1249

818

1189

Brantford 2021

29.9

7.0

60.3

205

1296

856

1208

Welland 2022

29.3

10.7

1.2

191

1293

853

1266

Welland 2021

27.8

7.3

29.6

129

1284

840

1195

Welland 10 YR Avg. (2011-20)

26.2

13.9

19.8

270

1257

798

1255

Elora 2022

28.9

7

3.7

167

1143

724

1086

Elora 2021

27.0

4.8

42.0

167

1181

750

1097

Elora 10 YR Avg.

(2011-20)

25.1

12.2

25.1

266

1115

669

1104

Mount Forest 2022

29.5

7.1

8.4

188

1143

731

1105

Mount Forest 2021

27.1

6.2

38.5

174

1187

760

1105

Mount Forest 10 YR Avg. (2011-20)

24.8

12.6

38.3

262

1097

659

1097

Peterborough 2022

27.6

6.7

0.6

213

1150

717

1116

Peterborough 2021

27.6

2.3

23.2

161

1173

732

1085

Peterborough 10 YR Avg. (2011-20)

25.8

10.8

19.4

248

1129

683

1111

Kemptville 2022

27.7

10.9

5.2

306

1242

789

1214

Kemptville 2021

28.9

4.9

25.8

172

1292

845

1176

Kemptville 10 YR Avg. (2011-20)

26.3

12.4

19.3

262

1185

741

1183

Earlton 2022

25.1

6.6

11.3

191

1019

636

1049

Earlton 2021

25.3

3.8

82.3

216

1099

677

1000

Earlton 10 YR Avg. (2011-20)

24.8

9.4

21.9

216

901

539

940

Sudbury 2022

23.8

6.6

6.2

195

1015

623

1027

Sudbury 2021

23.6

1.8

42.6

198

1097

677

1009

Sudbury 10 YR Avg. (2011-20)

24.9

10.7

23.0

240

977

593

1010

Thunder Bay 2022

30.6

3.6

3.6

344

815

459

793

Thunder Bay 2021

26.9

4.6

12.1

203

976

568

919

Thunder Bay 10 YR Avg. (2011-20)

24.4

7.7

28.8

240

824

450

812

Fort Frances 2022

26.3

2.4

4.0

377

868

515

895

Fort Frances 2021

29.0

0.3

8.6

154

1042

628

1017

Fort Frances 10 YR Avg. (2011-20)

25.1

9.2

22.7

226

937

546

955

Report compiled by OMAFRA using Environment Canada data. Data quality is verified but accuracy is not guaranteed. Report supplied for general information purposes only. An expanded report is available at www.fieldcropnews.com.

Ontario Field Crop Report – June 29, 2022

Spring Roundup

As we close out the 2022 spring planting window, for the most part we see crops in good shape, but as always, there are regional differences.

Alfalfa in western and southwestern Ontario suffered a great deal of die out this winter. Farmers had to make quick plans to address this issue. Alternatively, alfalfa and winter wheat in eastern Ontario weathered the winter better than normal and producers there are pleased with these crops. Frequent rains in the east, northwest, and Algoma district are challenging dry hay harvest.

The early spring wet period kept most out of the fields in late April and early May. While the rainfall rates were for the most part not excessive, we didn’t get typical spring sunny warm days to dry out the soil and the frequent small showers continued to slow down the drying process (Figure 1.). As well in many places’ soils were still saturated into spring from the excessively wet fall of 2021. These factors led to a condensed planting window for our major row crops. Eastern Ontario especially received more than average rainfall making for additional unwanted stress. The pressure at edible bean planting time had diminished but farmers were finding some dry soil conditions they had to contend with. This added extra pressure to the retail input suppliers and farmers to keep ground preparation going, planters rolling, and sprayers struggling to keep up.

Figure 1. Central Canada % Average Rainfall April 18-June 26

In general, the soil conditions have been excellent for seeding this spring when we finally got to them, we are now seeing evidence of compaction in areas created by starting in the fields when the soils were not quite” fit”. In many places soils were dry in the top ½” but saturated below. Working this ground too early leads to smearing and can cause problems with and following planting. With large planters and equipment, the number of acres that can be covered in short order means a “too early start” can impact a lot of acres. Additionally, the wet period was followed by a dry period and some producers over worked ground which made finding moisture at planting depth problematic. Those on heavy clay soils across various regions of the province had significant struggles in planting in a timely way into fit soils (Figure 2).

Figure 2. Soybean Stand Notilled into 20” Corn Stubble in Heavy Essex Clay

This past week with the heat, “pineapple” corn and rolled soybean leaves have been seen in both lighter and heavier soils. Moisture is needed to keep the good potential for yield on track. With the heat and where soil moisture is adequate, we are entering the elongation phase of corn growth leading to mid to late July tasselling depending on location. In soybeans, much of the crop is starting to flower. The heat has brought on rapid colour change in winter wheat as it heads toward grain fill and maturity.

With the condensed spring season, a significant acreage of intended T3 fungicide was not applied or applied late. Fusarium is showing up in fields in the southwest that are well advanced. Farmers should scout their fields to determine the level of fusarium damage and plan to harvest accordingly to ensure quality of the best portion of the crop.

Winds this spring never seemed to let up making the spraying job that much harder. Everyone needs to consider the risks of spraying under windy conditions which can lead to off target drift and injury to other crops/plants and reduces the efficacy of the products at their intended targets.

Weed control has been a struggle and it is important to scout fields as we enter summer. Are there weed escapes that need attention before we run out of time to address them? Are there weeds coming because of the weather conditions or maybe herbicide resistance? Its important to identify that now so you can prepare plans to address any resistance through your weed control choices in the coming fall and spring. Resistance should be checked by collecting seed of some of the escapes and submitting them according to the information at https://www.plant.uoguelph.ca/resistant-weeds.

If you are going to retreat weed escapes it is important to gather plants/seeds according to the instructions at the URL link above before treatment. Live plants that can set seed are needed to test for herbicide resistance. Resistance testing is important since many species are showing multi mode of action resistance. Not knowing the extent of resistance inhibits your ability to plan the best weed control program in future.  

A lot of time and dollars are invested in the 2022 crops currently growing. It is vitally important to preserve that yield potential by scouting those fields and addressing problems that can be fixed before we run out of management options available to the 2022 crop.

Weather Data

Location & Year

Weekly June 20-26 2022

Accumulated

Highest Temp (°C)

Lowest Temp (°C)

Rain (mm)

Rain (mm) April 1st

GDD 0C April 1st

GDD 5C April 1st

CHU May 1st

Harrow 2022

33.7

13.3

3.4

208

1237

835

1216

Harrow 2021

30.0

7.8

89.6

232

1238

822

1119

Harrow 10 YR Avg.

(2011-20)

26.8

15.1

26.8

264

1213

781

1184

Ridgetown 2022

33.0

9.8

0.5

174

1151

756

1106

Ridgetown 2021

29.7

6.1

98.2

233

1159

751

1057

Ridgetown 10 YR Avg. (2011-20)

26.3

13.6

15.1

223

1129

702

1094

London 2022

32.5

9.8

0.3

181

1119

729

1069

London 2021

28.2

7.5

66.2

201

1154

750

1026

London 10 YR Avg.

(2011-20)

26.1

13.8

28.6

252

1110

686

1077

Brantford 2022

34.2

8.5

6.6

176

1115

719

1034

Brantford 2021

29.9

7.0

60.3

183

1138

733

1015

Welland 2022

30.8

12.7

1.0

190

1158

753

1101

Welland 2021

27.8

7.3

29.6

122

1127

719

1002

Welland 10 YR Avg. (2011-20)

26.2

13.9

19.8

248

1111

686

1072

Elora 2022

32.6

8.0

0.0

163

1024

641

950

Elora 2021

27.0

4.8

42.0

161

1035

639

914

Elora 10 YR Avg.

(2011-20)

25.1

12.2

25.1

247

981

571

941

Mount Forest 2022

31.5

8.0

0.7

179

1028

651

974

Mount Forest 2021

27.1

6.2

38.5

140

1045

652

926

Mount Forest 10 YR Avg. (2011-20)

24.8

12.6

38.3

249

964

561

933

Peterborough 2022

31.4

10.0

0.4

212

1033

635

979

Peterborough 2021

27.6

2.3

23.2

129

1025

618

906

Peterborough 10 YR Avg. (2011-20)

25.8

10.8

19.4

236

993

582

948

Kemptville 2022

30.7

7.6

28.8

301

1106

689

1047

Kemptville 2021

28.9

4.9

25.8

168

1140

728

991

Kemptville 10 YR Avg.

(2011-20)

26.3

12.4

19.3

236

1040

630

1005

Earlton 2022

29.1

10.4

18.7

180

912

564

927

Earlton 2021

25.3

3.8

82.3

166

967

580

837

Earlton 10 YR Avg.

(2011-20)

24.8

9.4

21.9

202

772

446

786

Sudbury 2022

27.6

10.9

1.5

189

905

547

897

Sudbury 2021

23.6

1.8

42.6

178

965

580

846

Sudbury 10 YR Avg. (2011-20)

24.9

10.7

23.0

221

842

493

846

Thunder Bay 2022

33.9

8.7

4.9

340

706

385

671

Thunder Bay 2021

26.9

4.6

12.1

197

840

467

763

Thunder Bay 10 YR Avg. (2011-20)

24.4

7.7

28.8

214

700

361

664

Fort Frances 2022

34.6

4.7

44.0

373

774

456

792

Fort Frances 2021

29.0

0.3

8.6

154

904

526

864

Fort Frances 10 YR Avg. (2011-20)

25.1

9.2

22.7

212

808

451

802

Report compiled by OMAFRA using Environment Canada data. Data quality is verified but accuracy is not guaranteed. Report supplied for general information purposes only. An expanded report is available at www.fieldcropnews.com.

 

Leave a Comment