Ontario Field Crop Report – July 6, 2022
Enhancing Corn & Soybean Yields in Ontario
How adding complexity to crop rotations and diversity to tillage practices can benefit corn and soybean growers long term.
By Laura Scott
Gone are the days of grandpa getting the tractor and 3 furrow plow out to work the whole farm each fall after harvest. For decades now, producers have been developing and adapting new technologies and practices to optimize land use, while continuing to care for it. Thirty-one years of data evaluated by the University of Guelph demonstrates the various effects of changing tillage practices and crop rotations in Ontario field crop production.
It seems as though our seasons are becoming more and more variable each year, with bigger temperature swings and dramatic changes in precipitation. With more time between rain events, crops need to be efficient in water conservation and usage.
A research report published in 2015 titled “Increasing Crop Diversity Mitigates Weather Variations and Improves Yield Stability”, demonstrates that more diverse crop rotations beyond corn and soybeans is a key factor in yield increases. Reducing and adjusting tillage is also shown to have a significant effect on yield. As part of Dr. Bill Deen’s research team at the University of Guelph, Amelie Gaudin and colleagues studied thirty-one years of weather data from the University of Guelph, Elora Research Station. Both crop rotations and tillage data were evaluated for corn yield advantages, corn and soybean yield stability and any other potential benefits.
Their findings showed moving from a 2 crop (corn-soybean rotation) to a 3-crop rotation (adding wheat to corn-soybean rotation) increased the following average soybean yields by 13%. The 5-year average for Ontario soybeans is 49 bu/ac. The more crops in a rotation, and the more times the complex rotation repeated, the better the long-term effects.
Corn and soybeans displayed different yield reactions to the various methods of mitigating stresses (Figure 1.). While corn appeared to favour crop rotation and diversity, adjusting tillage practices had little effect on yield and stress tolerance. However, soybeans preferred changes in tillage programs over rotation diversification. Less tillage on soybean ground resulted in more consistent crop stress mitigation than conventional tillage. Tillage and crop diversity had a greater positive effect on crop response to heat and drought than they did for wet and cold periods. These practices offered some yield stabilization for wet and cold periods (or entire seasons), but it was lesser than the effects noted during drought stresses.
More recent research published in 2020, confirmed the earlier results. Sites across Canada and the United States saw an average yield increase of 28.1% across all conditions when crop rotations were more diverse (Long-Term Evidence Shows that Crop-Rotation Diversification Increases Agricultural Resilience to Adverse Growing Conditions in North America). They also saw a large reduction in yield losses on drought years. Sites used both synthetic nitrogen and organic nitrogen, and varied tillage systems between no till, reduced till and conventional tillage.
Adding small grain cereals, forage legumes and other niche crops can add some costs and can complicate management practices, but does it have a place on your operation? The more complex the rotation, and the more diverse the tillage practices, the higher the potential to reduce crop stresses. Add in the potential benefits for weed, pest and disease control, and the value may soon dramatically outweigh the cost for your farming operation.
Weather Data
|
Location & Year |
Weekly June 27 – July 3 2022 |
Accumulated |
|||||
|
Highest Temp (°C) |
Lowest Temp (°C) |
Rain (mm) |
Rain (mm) April 1st |
GDD 0C April 1st |
GDD 5C April 1st |
CHU May 1st |
|
|
Harrow 2022 |
31.1 |
9.2 |
0.9 |
209 |
1388 |
950 |
1399 |
|
Harrow 2021 |
30.0 |
7.8 |
89.6 |
242 |
1397 |
946 |
1316 |
|
Harrow 10 YR Avg. (2011-20) |
26.8 |
15.1 |
26.8 |
291 |
1369 |
901 |
1379 |
|
Ridgetown 2022 |
31.2 |
6.6 |
2.4 |
177 |
1293 |
864 |
1275 |
|
Ridgetown 2021 |
29.7 |
6.1 |
98.2 |
240 |
1314 |
871 |
1246 |
|
Ridgetown 10 YR Avg. (2011-20) |
26.3 |
13.6 |
15.1 |
241 |
1279 |
817 |
1278 |
|
London 2022 |
29.8 |
6.6 |
8.6 |
190 |
1252 |
827 |
1225 |
|
London 2021 |
28.2 |
7.5 |
66.2 |
213 |
1309 |
870 |
1217 |
|
London 10 YR Avg. (2011-20) |
26.1 |
13.8 |
28.6 |
267 |
1256 |
797 |
1256 |
|
Brantford 2022 |
31.4 |
7.4 |
4.2 |
180 |
1249 |
818 |
1189 |
|
Brantford 2021 |
29.9 |
7.0 |
60.3 |
205 |
1296 |
856 |
1208 |
|
Welland 2022 |
29.3 |
10.7 |
1.2 |
191 |
1293 |
853 |
1266 |
|
Welland 2021 |
27.8 |
7.3 |
29.6 |
129 |
1284 |
840 |
1195 |
|
Welland 10 YR Avg. (2011-20) |
26.2 |
13.9 |
19.8 |
270 |
1257 |
798 |
1255 |
|
Elora 2022 |
28.9 |
7 |
3.7 |
167 |
1143 |
724 |
1086 |
|
Elora 2021 |
27.0 |
4.8 |
42.0 |
167 |
1181 |
750 |
1097 |
|
Elora 10 YR Avg. (2011-20) |
25.1 |
12.2 |
25.1 |
266 |
1115 |
669 |
1104 |
|
Mount Forest 2022 |
29.5 |
7.1 |
8.4 |
188 |
1143 |
731 |
1105 |
|
Mount Forest 2021 |
27.1 |
6.2 |
38.5 |
174 |
1187 |
760 |
1105 |
|
Mount Forest 10 YR Avg. (2011-20) |
24.8 |
12.6 |
38.3 |
262 |
1097 |
659 |
1097 |
|
Peterborough 2022 |
27.6 |
6.7 |
0.6 |
213 |
1150 |
717 |
1116 |
|
Peterborough 2021 |
27.6 |
2.3 |
23.2 |
161 |
1173 |
732 |
1085 |
|
Peterborough 10 YR Avg. (2011-20) |
25.8 |
10.8 |
19.4 |
248 |
1129 |
683 |
1111 |
|
Kemptville 2022 |
27.7 |
10.9 |
5.2 |
306 |
1242 |
789 |
1214 |
|
Kemptville 2021 |
28.9 |
4.9 |
25.8 |
172 |
1292 |
845 |
1176 |
|
Kemptville 10 YR Avg. (2011-20) |
26.3 |
12.4 |
19.3 |
262 |
1185 |
741 |
1183 |
|
Earlton 2022 |
25.1 |
6.6 |
11.3 |
191 |
1019 |
636 |
1049 |
|
Earlton 2021 |
25.3 |
3.8 |
82.3 |
216 |
1099 |
677 |
1000 |
|
Earlton 10 YR Avg. (2011-20) |
24.8 |
9.4 |
21.9 |
216 |
901 |
539 |
940 |
|
Sudbury 2022 |
23.8 |
6.6 |
6.2 |
195 |
1015 |
623 |
1027 |
|
Sudbury 2021 |
23.6 |
1.8 |
42.6 |
198 |
1097 |
677 |
1009 |
|
Sudbury 10 YR Avg. (2011-20) |
24.9 |
10.7 |
23.0 |
240 |
977 |
593 |
1010 |
|
Thunder Bay 2022 |
30.6 |
3.6 |
3.6 |
344 |
815 |
459 |
793 |
|
Thunder Bay 2021 |
26.9 |
4.6 |
12.1 |
203 |
976 |
568 |
919 |
|
Thunder Bay 10 YR Avg. (2011-20) |
24.4 |
7.7 |
28.8 |
240 |
824 |
450 |
812 |
|
Fort Frances 2022 |
26.3 |
2.4 |
4.0 |
377 |
868 |
515 |
895 |
|
Fort Frances 2021 |
29.0 |
0.3 |
8.6 |
154 |
1042 |
628 |
1017 |
|
Fort Frances 10 YR Avg. (2011-20) |
25.1 |
9.2 |
22.7 |
226 |
937 |
546 |
955 |
|
Report compiled by OMAFRA using Environment Canada data. Data quality is verified but accuracy is not guaranteed. Report supplied for general information purposes only. An expanded report is available at www.fieldcropnews.com. |
|||||||
Ontario Field Crop Report – June 29, 2022
Spring Roundup
As we close out the 2022 spring planting window, for the most part we see crops in good shape, but as always, there are regional differences.
Alfalfa in western and southwestern Ontario suffered a great deal of die out this winter. Farmers had to make quick plans to address this issue. Alternatively, alfalfa and winter wheat in eastern Ontario weathered the winter better than normal and producers there are pleased with these crops. Frequent rains in the east, northwest, and Algoma district are challenging dry hay harvest.
The early spring wet period kept most out of the fields in late April and early May. While the rainfall rates were for the most part not excessive, we didn’t get typical spring sunny warm days to dry out the soil and the frequent small showers continued to slow down the drying process (Figure 1.). As well in many places’ soils were still saturated into spring from the excessively wet fall of 2021. These factors led to a condensed planting window for our major row crops. Eastern Ontario especially received more than average rainfall making for additional unwanted stress. The pressure at edible bean planting time had diminished but farmers were finding some dry soil conditions they had to contend with. This added extra pressure to the retail input suppliers and farmers to keep ground preparation going, planters rolling, and sprayers struggling to keep up.
In general, the soil conditions have been excellent for seeding this spring when we finally got to them, we are now seeing evidence of compaction in areas created by starting in the fields when the soils were not quite” fit”. In many places soils were dry in the top ½” but saturated below. Working this ground too early leads to smearing and can cause problems with and following planting. With large planters and equipment, the number of acres that can be covered in short order means a “too early start” can impact a lot of acres. Additionally, the wet period was followed by a dry period and some producers over worked ground which made finding moisture at planting depth problematic. Those on heavy clay soils across various regions of the province had significant struggles in planting in a timely way into fit soils (Figure 2).
This past week with the heat, “pineapple” corn and rolled soybean leaves have been seen in both lighter and heavier soils. Moisture is needed to keep the good potential for yield on track. With the heat and where soil moisture is adequate, we are entering the elongation phase of corn growth leading to mid to late July tasselling depending on location. In soybeans, much of the crop is starting to flower. The heat has brought on rapid colour change in winter wheat as it heads toward grain fill and maturity.
With the condensed spring season, a significant acreage of intended T3 fungicide was not applied or applied late. Fusarium is showing up in fields in the southwest that are well advanced. Farmers should scout their fields to determine the level of fusarium damage and plan to harvest accordingly to ensure quality of the best portion of the crop.
Winds this spring never seemed to let up making the spraying job that much harder. Everyone needs to consider the risks of spraying under windy conditions which can lead to off target drift and injury to other crops/plants and reduces the efficacy of the products at their intended targets.
Weed control has been a struggle and it is important to scout fields as we enter summer. Are there weed escapes that need attention before we run out of time to address them? Are there weeds coming because of the weather conditions or maybe herbicide resistance? Its important to identify that now so you can prepare plans to address any resistance through your weed control choices in the coming fall and spring. Resistance should be checked by collecting seed of some of the escapes and submitting them according to the information at https://www.plant.uoguelph.ca/resistant-weeds.
If you are going to retreat weed escapes it is important to gather plants/seeds according to the instructions at the URL link above before treatment. Live plants that can set seed are needed to test for herbicide resistance. Resistance testing is important since many species are showing multi mode of action resistance. Not knowing the extent of resistance inhibits your ability to plan the best weed control program in future.
A lot of time and dollars are invested in the 2022 crops currently growing. It is vitally important to preserve that yield potential by scouting those fields and addressing problems that can be fixed before we run out of management options available to the 2022 crop.
Weather Data
|
Location & Year |
Weekly June 20-26 2022 |
Accumulated |
|||||
|
Highest Temp (°C) |
Lowest Temp (°C) |
Rain (mm) |
Rain (mm) April 1st |
GDD 0C April 1st |
GDD 5C April 1st |
CHU May 1st |
|
|
Harrow 2022 |
33.7 |
13.3 |
3.4 |
208 |
1237 |
835 |
1216 |
|
Harrow 2021 |
30.0 |
7.8 |
89.6 |
232 |
1238 |
822 |
1119 |
|
Harrow 10 YR Avg. (2011-20) |
26.8 |
15.1 |
26.8 |
264 |
1213 |
781 |
1184 |
|
Ridgetown 2022 |
33.0 |
9.8 |
0.5 |
174 |
1151 |
756 |
1106 |
|
Ridgetown 2021 |
29.7 |
6.1 |
98.2 |
233 |
1159 |
751 |
1057 |
|
Ridgetown 10 YR Avg. (2011-20) |
26.3 |
13.6 |
15.1 |
223 |
1129 |
702 |
1094 |
|
London 2022 |
32.5 |
9.8 |
0.3 |
181 |
1119 |
729 |
1069 |
|
London 2021 |
28.2 |
7.5 |
66.2 |
201 |
1154 |
750 |
1026 |
|
London 10 YR Avg. (2011-20) |
26.1 |
13.8 |
28.6 |
252 |
1110 |
686 |
1077 |
|
Brantford 2022 |
34.2 |
8.5 |
6.6 |
176 |
1115 |
719 |
1034 |
|
Brantford 2021 |
29.9 |
7.0 |
60.3 |
183 |
1138 |
733 |
1015 |
|
Welland 2022 |
30.8 |
12.7 |
1.0 |
190 |
1158 |
753 |
1101 |
|
Welland 2021 |
27.8 |
7.3 |
29.6 |
122 |
1127 |
719 |
1002 |
|
Welland 10 YR Avg. (2011-20) |
26.2 |
13.9 |
19.8 |
248 |
1111 |
686 |
1072 |
|
Elora 2022 |
32.6 |
8.0 |
0.0 |
163 |
1024 |
641 |
950 |
|
Elora 2021 |
27.0 |
4.8 |
42.0 |
161 |
1035 |
639 |
914 |
|
Elora 10 YR Avg. (2011-20) |
25.1 |
12.2 |
25.1 |
247 |
981 |
571 |
941 |
|
Mount Forest 2022 |
31.5 |
8.0 |
0.7 |
179 |
1028 |
651 |
974 |
|
Mount Forest 2021 |
27.1 |
6.2 |
38.5 |
140 |
1045 |
652 |
926 |
|
Mount Forest 10 YR Avg. (2011-20) |
24.8 |
12.6 |
38.3 |
249 |
964 |
561 |
933 |
|
Peterborough 2022 |
31.4 |
10.0 |
0.4 |
212 |
1033 |
635 |
979 |
|
Peterborough 2021 |
27.6 |
2.3 |
23.2 |
129 |
1025 |
618 |
906 |
|
Peterborough 10 YR Avg. (2011-20) |
25.8 |
10.8 |
19.4 |
236 |
993 |
582 |
948 |
|
Kemptville 2022 |
30.7 |
7.6 |
28.8 |
301 |
1106 |
689 |
1047 |
|
Kemptville 2021 |
28.9 |
4.9 |
25.8 |
168 |
1140 |
728 |
991 |
|
Kemptville 10 YR Avg. (2011-20) |
26.3 |
12.4 |
19.3 |
236 |
1040 |
630 |
1005 |
|
Earlton 2022 |
29.1 |
10.4 |
18.7 |
180 |
912 |
564 |
927 |
|
Earlton 2021 |
25.3 |
3.8 |
82.3 |
166 |
967 |
580 |
837 |
|
Earlton 10 YR Avg. (2011-20) |
24.8 |
9.4 |
21.9 |
202 |
772 |
446 |
786 |
|
Sudbury 2022 |
27.6 |
10.9 |
1.5 |
189 |
905 |
547 |
897 |
|
Sudbury 2021 |
23.6 |
1.8 |
42.6 |
178 |
965 |
580 |
846 |
|
Sudbury 10 YR Avg. (2011-20) |
24.9 |
10.7 |
23.0 |
221 |
842 |
493 |
846 |
|
Thunder Bay 2022 |
33.9 |
8.7 |
4.9 |
340 |
706 |
385 |
671 |
|
Thunder Bay 2021 |
26.9 |
4.6 |
12.1 |
197 |
840 |
467 |
763 |
|
Thunder Bay 10 YR Avg. (2011-20) |
24.4 |
7.7 |
28.8 |
214 |
700 |
361 |
664 |
|
Fort Frances 2022 |
34.6 |
4.7 |
44.0 |
373 |
774 |
456 |
792 |
|
Fort Frances 2021 |
29.0 |
0.3 |
8.6 |
154 |
904 |
526 |
864 |
|
Fort Frances 10 YR Avg. (2011-20) |
25.1 |
9.2 |
22.7 |
212 |
808 |
451 |
802 |
|
Report compiled by OMAFRA using Environment Canada data. Data quality is verified but accuracy is not guaranteed. Report supplied for general information purposes only. An expanded report is available at www.fieldcropnews.com. |
|||||||


